Synology DSM · TLS · Help

Synology: maximum certificate requests reached

Separate the DSM message from a confirmed ACME rate limit and check domain validation and certificate assignment.

Source date: 5 November 2026Editorial team: KAN KAI WORKSEditorially updated:

Quick answer

Synology's message about too many certificate attempts does not identify a particular Let's Encrypt limit by itself. Obtain the complete ACME error and any stated retry time before trying again. Then inspect domain resolution and external challenge reachability. Preserve any currently valid certificate: repeated requests or changing its service assignment will not automatically resolve the underlying validation failure.

Source basis: Q1 · Q2 · Q3

Applies to
Covers certificate requests managed through DSM. The DSM 7.4.0.1 report lacks a complete ACME error, so it cannot establish a specific limit or waiting period.
How to verify the result
An eligible request validates successfully, the resulting certificate contains the intended names and validity dates, and the affected DSM service actually presents it.
Your first check

Is there an actual ACME limit response or only the DSM message?

Record the exact wording and available details. Without the certificate authority’s response, a specific waiting period cannot be established.

DSM refuses a certificate request with a message about the maximum number of requests or attempts. It is tempting to wait an assumed number of days or repeatedly request different names. In the documented Synology incident, however, a specific Let’s Encrypt rate limit was not established. A translated interface message alone cannot identify the upstream failure. Q1

Separate two different situations

A genuine ACME rate limit and an unsuccessful domain challenge require different actions. For a confirmed limit, use its type and returned guidance; revoking a certificate does not reset those limits. Q2 For an unreachable validation endpoint, the technical failure remains even if you click the button again later.

Collect a useful baseline

  1. Preserve the current state. Record the DSM version, requested names, timestamp and complete message. Keep the existing certificate and service assignments. Do not delete a usable certificate in an attempt to reset an assumed counter.
  2. Find the underlying response. Inspect the diagnostics or logs available for your DSM version. Look for the certificate authority's actual error and any retry time. If those details are unavailable, explicitly mark the rate-limit explanation as unconfirmed.
  3. Identify the domain and challenge path. Distinguish your own domain, third-party DDNS and Synology DDNS. Use the applicable manufacturer instructions to identify the expected validation method. Check its DNS and external reachability; opening DSM successfully from inside the LAN does not verify the whole path.
  4. Compare the request with deployment. Check which names the existing certificate covers and which service uses it. DSM provides certificate management and service assignment separately. Q3 A successfully renewed file only helps the affected service when that service actually presents it.
  5. Make the next attempt purposeful. For a confirmed limit, respect the returned retry guidance. For a challenge failure, repair the identified path first. Do not change domain lists merely to evade a guessed counter.

Define a successful outcome

Verify three observations: the request is accepted, the resulting names and validity dates are correct, and the affected service presents that certificate. Record each observation with a timestamp. The disappearance of an interface error alone is not sufficient confirmation.

For handoff, prepare the DSM version, domain type, DNS results, sanitised error details and service mapping. Passwords and private keys are not needed in an initial enquiry. If only the general interface message is available, make that remaining uncertainty visible rather than filling it with a guessed waiting period.

Frequently asked questions

Must I always wait several days?

Not on the basis of this message alone. The actual limit response is needed to establish meaningful retry guidance.

Will deleting the old certificate help?

It does not establish the cause and can interrupt working access. Preserve the usable configuration during diagnosis.

Describe your case

Support with this issue

We can investigate the DSM certificate workflow, domain validation and service mapping.

Sources